Books about Collegial from Amazon.com



Crafting Law on the Supreme Court: The Collegial Game
In Crafting Law on the Supreme Court, Maltzman, Spriggs, and Wahlbeck use material gleaned from internal memos circulated among justices on the U.S. Supreme Court to systematically account for the building of majority opinions. The authors argue that at the heart of this process are justices whose decisions are constrained by the choices made by the other justices. The portrait of the Supreme Court that emerges stands in sharp contrast to the conventional portrait where justices act solely on the basis of the law or their personal policy preferences. This book provides a fascinating glimpse of how the Court crafts the law..
Price: $52.92 [Notify me when price goes down.]


Judging on a Collegial Court: Influences on Federal Appellate Decision Making (Constitutionalism and Democracy)
Dissensus is often viewed in the professional world as a starting point for collaboration; rather than leaving decisions to just one person, dissent offers the opportunity to rethink or reinvent an idea, leading, one hopes, to a better result. When dissensus occurs in a federal court, however, it raises the question of whether this difference of opinion maintains the integrity of the judiciary or undermines its legitimacy. In Judging on a Collegial Court: Influences on Federal Appellate Decision Making, Virginia Hettinger, Stefanie Lindquist, and Wendy Martinek examine the dynamic that gives rise to such dissensus in federal appeals courts, revealing how the appellate process shapes the content and the consistency of the law.

The authors examine horizontal dissensus in the minority of cases in which there are dissenting or concurring--as opposed to unanimous--opinions. Primarily investigating why judges on the appeals courts agree or disagree with one another regarding the outcomes of the cases before them, the authors also examine vertical dissensus and ask why judges affirm or reverse lower court judges whose cases are decided on appeal. Focusing on the behavioral aspects of disagreement within a panel and between the levels of the federal judicial hierarchy, the authors reveal the impact of individual attitudes or preferences on judicial decision-making, and hence on political divisions in the broader society..
Price: $16.95 [Notify me when price goes down.]



Collegial Professionalism: The Academy, Individualism, And The Common Good (American Council on Education Oryx Press Series on Higher Education)
John Bennett offers a provocative and tightly knit argument on ethics in higher education He examines the current condition of faculty isolation and organizational fragmentation, which he believes has led to a penchant for "insistent individualism" at many institutions of higher learning. Bennett presents a philosophical model that reflects the academy in its current state, where the focus is on private interests and promotion, and then offers an engaging alternative..
Price: $49.95 [Notify me when price goes down.]


<< cela camilo josé



All trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
Copyright 1996-2007 CHHS, your place for CHHS, Plano, Texas, 10220