Books about Collegial from Amazon.com



Crafting Law on the Supreme Court: The Collegial Game
In Crafting Law on the Supreme Court, Maltzman, Spriggs, and Wahlbeck use material gleaned from internal memos circulated among justices on the U.S. Supreme Court to systematically account for the building of majority opinions. The authors argue that at the heart of this process are justices whose decisions are constrained by the choices made by the other justices. The portrait of the Supreme Court that emerges stands in sharp contrast to the conventional portrait where justices act solely on the basis of the law or their personal policy preferences. This book provides a fascinating glimpse of how the Court crafts the law..
Price: $15.00 [Notify me when price goes down.]


Judging on a Collegial Court: Influences on Federal Appellate Decision Making (Constitutionalism and Democracy)
[ Judging on a Collegial Court ] is theoretically rich and methodologically sophisticated." -- Law and Politics Book Review

"Using sophisticated state-of-the-art statistical techniques, the authors present convincing and often surprising answers to their research questions. Their work helps to illuminate judicial voting and judicial opinion behavior on the appeals courts and as such contributes to our understanding of appeals court decision-making. The book will surely be considered a classic in the field." -- Sheldon Goldman, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, author of Picking Federal Judges: Lower Court Selection from Roosevelt through Reagan

"This is an excellent and ambitious work that is theoretically driven and empirically grounded. The authors offer a persuasive and compelling account of the internal dynamics of the U.S. Courts of Appeals.... It is challenging to offer a unified circuit court model. But the authors do that and much more. The resulting work is meticulously researched and well-written. It will be a definitive work on the courts." -- Tracey E. George, Vanderbilt University

Dissensus is often viewed in the professional world as a starting point for collaboration; rather than leaving decisions to just one person, dissent offers the opportunity to rethink or reinvent an idea, leading, one hopes, to a better result. When dissensus occurs in a federal court, however, it raises the question of whether this difference of opinion maintains the integrity of the judiciary or undermines its legitimacy. In Judging on a Collegial Court: Influences on Federal Appellate Decision Making, Virginia Hettinger, Stefanie Lindquist, and Wendy Martinek examine the dynamic that gives rise to such dissensus in federal appeals courts, revealing how the appellate process shapes the content and the consistency of the law.

Virginia A. Hettinger is Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Connecticut. Stefanie A. Lindquist is Associate Professor of Political Science and Law at Vanderbilt University. Wendy L. Martinek is Associate Professor of Political Science at Binghamton University, State University of New York.

Constitutionalism and Democracy.
Price: $2.06 [Notify me when price goes down.]



Collegial Professionalism: The Academy, Individualism, And The Common Good (American Council on Education Oryx Press Series on Higher Education)
John Bennett offers a provocative and tightly knit argument on ethics in higher education He examines the current condition of faculty isolation and organizational fragmentation, which he believes has led to a penchant for "insistent individualism" at many institutions of higher learning. Bennett presents a philosophical model that reflects the academy in its current state, where the focus is on private interests and promotion, and then offers an engaging alternative..
Price: $49.95 [Notify me when price goes down.]


<< cela camilo josé



All trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
Copyright 1996-2007 CHHS, your place for CHHS, Plano, Texas, 10220