Books about Indicting from Amazon.com



The Cedarville Conspiracy: Indicting U.S. Steel
On the morning of May 7, 1965, the American freighter Cedarville collided with the Norwegian vessel Topdalsfjord in heavy fog in the Straits of Mackinac Ultimately, ten crew members of the Cedarville died and a legal battle ensued implicating U.S. Steel---the company that owned the Cedarville---in the chain of events leading to the tragedy.

The Cedarville Conspiracy is the story of that doomed ship and its crew. It is also the first Great Lakes history to expose the heroism, villainy, courage, and confusion surrounding the Cedarville disaster.

In atmospheric, cinematic style, L. Stephen Cox's gripping page-turner dramatizes the events surrounding the collision between the Norwegian and American freighters. As the mortally wounded Cedarville began to list and sink, U.S. Steel refused to allow the crew to escape to safety, while the captain secretly donned his life jacket and abandoned the sinking ship. Ten seamen died in the frigid waters that morning as the captain and survivors swam to safety.

Researching the story, author L. Stephen Cox interviewed the surviving crew and their rescuers and attorneys, examined more than 20,000 pages of Coast Guard reports, and discovered deposition transcripts and other documentary evidence that detailed the deterioration of the ship, the captain's disregard of Great Lakes navigational rules, the company's participation in the decision to confine the men aboard the sinking vessel, and the subsequent efforts by U.S. Steel to manipulate the evidence.
.
Price: $11.03 [Notify me when price goes down.]


War Crimes: Indicting Tony Blair (Spokesman)
On the 3rd April 2007, the Russian News Agency, Novosti, reported a statement by Yuri Baluyevsky, the head of the Russian Armed Forces General Staff. He warned that `Washington needs to think twice before launching a military campaign against Tehran, as such an attack would have global implications'. The General said that it might be realistic to anticipate that the Americans could inflict damage on Iran's military and industrial potential: `but winning the war is unachievable - its reverberations would be heard across the world'.

General Baluyevsky said that when deciding upon military action against Iran, the US leadership should bear in mind the negative experience it had garnered in other countries of the region. He warned that if the US goes to war with Iran as well as Afghanistan and Iraq `the world may see America decline as the world's mightiest and most powerful state'.

Other Russian spokesmen had previously warned of possible American air strikes on April 6th, Good Friday.[1] There have also been repeated warnings by critics of the regime in Washington, not so specific, but pointing up strong possibilities of such military initiatives.[2] White House spokeswoman, Dana Perino, denied all these stories at a news briefing on Monday 2nd April. The news had been widely reported that the American aircraft carrier, Nimitz, with a supporting flotilla of lesser ships, was bound for the Persian Gulf to join other aircraft carrier strike groups already hovering there. The American military claimed that the presence of two major carriers in the Gulf was `intended to demonstrate US "resolve to build regional security and bring long term stability to the region".'

Previously fifteen British sailors and marines had been detained by Iranian forces, when they were alleged to be operating in Iranian territorial waters.[3] This allegation had been strenuously, even belligerently, denied by Tony Blair, although Craig Murray, the former Ambassador in Tashkent, who was victimised by the Foreign Office for undiplomatically speaking up for human rights in Uzbekistan, offered rather compelling testimony to show that arguments about the positioning of the frontier between Iraqi and Iranian territorial waters were somewhat metaphysical in nature.

Before his time in Tashkent, Mr. Murray spent several years in a basement in Whitehall, seeking to determine maritime boundaries for the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. He had been personally responsible in the Embargo Surveillance Centre for getting `individual real time clearance for the Royal Navy to board specific vessels in these waters'. He says of the present dispute: `As I feared, Blair adopted the stupid and confrontational approach of publishing maps ignoring the boundaries dispute, thus claiming a very blurred situation is crystal clear and the Iranians totally in the wrong.'

Mr. Murray continues: `Tony Blair's contempt for Middle Eastern lives has already been adequately demonstrated in Iraq and Lebanon. His lack of genuine concern for British servicemen is demonstrated by his steadfast refusal to meet even one parent of a dead British serviceman or woman killed in the wars he created.'

Footnotes:

1. Colonel General Leonid Ivashov, Vice President of the Academy of Geo-political Sciences, warned that `The Pentagon is planning to deliver a massive air strike on Iran's military infrastructure in the near future'. Andre Uglanov reported in Arguments and Facts that he expected an onslaught from various bases, including Diego Garcia and the aircraft carriers currently deployed in the Persian Gulf. He cited Ivashov as anticipating an American attack, `or more precisely a violent action against Iran'.

2. See, notably, the recent statements by Seymour Hersh and Scott Ritter.

3. Since these words were written, a dramatic announcement was made by President Ahmadinejad at the end of a discourse on recent foreign policy developments. He ceremonially decorated the Revolutionary Guards who had captured the fifteen British sailors and marines, and then announced their imminent and unconditional release. They had been pardoned he said, in commemoration of the birthday of the prophet Muhammad, of Easter, and of the Passover. Kitted out with new suits presented by the Iranian authorities, the fifteen, laden with presents, were flown out of Tehran the next morning..
Price: $16.50 [Notify me when price goes down.]


An International Criminal Court? A single peak body indicting figures of evil will never get at the complex truths behind crimes against humanity. (against ... current).: An article from: Arena Magazine
This digital document is an article from Arena Magazine, published by Arena Printing and Publications Pty. Ltd. on August 1, 2002. The length of the article is 1115 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

Citation Details
Title: An International Criminal Court? A single peak body indicting figures of evil will never get at the complex truths behind crimes against humanity. (against the current).
Author: James Paul Warburg
Publication:Arena Magazine (Refereed)
Date: August 1, 2002
Publisher: Arena Printing and Publications Pty. Ltd.
Page: 8(2)

Distributed by Thomson Gale.
Price: $5.95 [Notify me when price goes down.]


The law: the CIA leak case indicting Vice President Cheney's Chief of Staff.(Dick Cheney, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby): An article from: Presidential Studies Quarterly
This digital document is an article from Presidential Studies Quarterly, published by Thomson Gale on June 1, 2006. The length of the article is 7477 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

From the author: In June 2003, citing "two senior administration officials," syndicated columnist Robert Novak openly identified Valerie Plame as a Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) "operative." As it can be a felony under the Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982 to knowingly identify a covert agent of the United States, a grand jury was impaneled to investigate whether or not any Bush administration officials had actually broken the law by outing Plame. After a nearly two-year-long investigation, the grand jury returned an indictment against Vice President Dick Cheney's former Chief of Staff I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, charging him with the ancillary crimes of making false statements, perjury, and obstruction of justice. No one, however, has yet been charged with the underlying crime of leaking the classified identity of a CIA agent. This article explains why indictments have been issued for alleged cover-up crimes, while no one, to date, has been indicted for outing an intelligence operative. After a brief review of the story behind the leak and an overview of the five-count indictment, the article analyzes the Intelligence Identities Protection Act and the related Espionage Act, focusing on why no one has yet been indicted for violating these laws. The article concludes with a cautionary note on why this case is not necessarily over--and why it is even possible, although unlikely, that Bush administration officials might be indicted under the Espionage Act.

Citation Details
Title: The law: the CIA leak case indicting Vice President Cheney's Chief of Staff.(Dick Cheney, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby)
Author: Louis Klarevas
Publication:Presidential Studies Quarterly (Magazine/Journal)
Date: June 1, 2006
Publisher: Thomson Gale
Volume: 36 Issue: 2 Page: 309(14)

Distributed by Thomson Gale.
Price: $5.95 [Notify me when price goes down.]


<< ilf ilya



All trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
Copyright 1996-2007 CHHS, your place for CHHS, Plano, Texas, 10220