This
digital document is an
article from Social Theory and Practice,
published by Social Theory and Practice-Florida State
University on March 22, 1997. The length of the
article is 6154 words. The page length shown above is based on a
typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.
From the supplier: George Sher's theory of deserved punishment is unable to account for cases in which wrongdoing does not result in unfair advantages. Sher attempts to connect punishment with distributive justice by suggesting that punishment is deserved inasmuch as the unfair advantage gained by wrongdoing is offset. According to Sher's diachronic theory of fairness, punishment is also deserved when it occurs in response to transgression of a first-order ethical norm. A problem for the theory concerns the justification it provides for disparate treatment of wrongdoers who are morally indistinguishable.
Citation DetailsTitle: George Sher's theory of deserved punishment, and the victimized wrongdoer.
Author: Stephen Kershnar
Publication:Social Theory and Practice (Refereed)
Date: March 22, 1997
Publisher: Social Theory and Practice-Florida State University
Volume: v23
Issue: n1
Page: p75(17)
Distributed by Thomson Gale.
Price:
$5.95
[
Notify me when price goes down.]